
DIRECTOR'S PERSPECTIVE
by Saruhan Hatipoglu
sshatipoglu@beri.com
THE TWISTED INVISIBLE HAND & OIL
PRICES:
To the
Victors Belong the Spoils
©2004 BERI S.A - September 2004
Man-Made Crisis: Oil prices came
close to hitting US$50/bbl in mid-August, embarrassing experts who claimed that
the year-end cost would be under US$30 in 2004. Adam Smith’s invisible hand
was operating freely, and supply and demand functions were working as expected
during the first quarter of the year when the prediction occurred. Then, human
nature twisted the invisible hand.
First, sporadic attacks in
Iraq encouraged speculators to react swiftly and raise the price of crude oil.
People are nervous about consistent supplies of oil from the Middle East regimes
and the scope of oil exports in a region held hostage by terrorism. Then, the
infamous Yukos saga added salt to the bleeding wound. Speculators were worried
about the potential bankruptcy of the company and its adverse impact on oil
prices. This concern was exaggerated but, with daily production of about 1.7-1.8
million b/d, the problems of Yukos were seen as a potential threat to oil
prices. In reality, whether Yukos is in the hands of its original owner or
government officials, Russia will do its utmost to maintain production.
Current Impact on Developed Countries:
The United States is clearly more adversely affected by the high cost of oil
than Europe and Japan. U.S. consumers paid an estimated US$60 billion during the
first half of 2004 because of high energy prices. Furthermore, American business
incurred a bill close to US$40 billion for not passing on higher costs to
consumers in this competitive environment. The impact during July-August was
severe.
Europe has been cushioned
against high oil prices largely because of the appreciation of the euro
and other currencies against the US$. European consumers did not feel any
large impact until the second quarter of the year. It is estimated that during
June-August, energy prices took 0.5% from European disposable income, less than
US$10 billion. Japan consumes 7% of world oil supplies and imports all its oil.
Although the country was also partially insulated from high energy prices in the
first half of the year due to a stable currency, the high cost of oil is slowly
beginning to hurt domestic business and consumers. The price of crude oil is up
31.2% from a year earlier.
Clearly, in the short-term,
oil prices will inflict damage on economies and threaten global recovery, but
the question is: What is the future of crude oil and the five-year trend of oil
prices? What we are witnessing now is not any different than previous
fluctuations dictated by the supply/demand function, and aggravated by
speculators. However, there is certainly room for concern because long-term
price dynamics are in the process of shifting.
Supply Is Adequate:
Supply in the next 5-10 years is not jeopardized by the volume of
crude in the ground and the facilities in place to produce and transport it,
despite the recent statement from OPEC that its members drilled 6.5% fewer wells
last year. Some analysts believe that lack of investment in the past decade will
constrain capacity in the coming years, but proven oil reserves were at 1.2
trillion barrels in 2003, compared to 1 trillion five years ago and under 650
billion in 1980 according to Oil & Gas Journal. OPEC will stick to its promise
of raising production by another 2 million, if recent past is any indicator:
OPEC lifted total oil output by 10.5% in 2003 from 24.32 million bpd to 26.88
million. It is already producing 15% higher than its quota, and new production
is not costly. The decision on new quotas will be made in mid-September, but the
organization has been sending strong signals of a production increase since
early June. With 78% of the world’s oil and half of natural gas reserves, OPEC’s
declaration should have been heeded by the market, which would have constrained
steep price increases.
In addition, other suppliers
will have growing influence in oil production in the near future. In late
August, President Vladimir Putin announced that the country will increase output
5.9% to 9.1 million b/d. This preceded the statement of the Economy Minister
that Russia will export 250 million tons (5.035 million b/d) of oil this year,
11.6% more than a year earlier. The inability of the existing pipeline network
to pump more oil will curtail production, but sustained investment activity will
raise capacity to an expected 475 million tons (9.565 million b/d) by 2007.
Long term supply is
potentially jeopardized by the U.S.’s inability to establish peace and stability
in Iraq and by the enmity in the Muslim world created by the presence of Western
forces (mostly American) in Afghanistan and Iraq. These developments have been
catalytic in recruiting extremists and suicidal zealots. It is now less certain
that the sheikhdoms will survive in the coming years. Alternative governments in
the Middle East, guided more by ideology and religious fervor than the economics
of supplying the marketplace, could limit shipments to the infidels in
the West.
Rising Demand Is Real and Lasting:
Human judgments on the supply-side is one variable of the price equation, but
the impact of steadily increasing demand is a crucial factor and will be the
primary reason for real long-term oil price increases. Total demand for oil is
currently about 79.7 million bpd. The International Energy Agency expects global
oil demand to rise by 2.5 million to 82.2 million barrels this year and by
another 1.8 million to 84.0 million barrels in 2005.
The U.S dominates
consumption, accounting for nearly 25% of oil usage, while Europe consumes close
to 15%. Emerging markets such as China and India (constituting10% of global
demand) are also putting considerable upward pressure on demand. In fact, China
passed Japan last year to become the world’s second largest oil consuming
country. Although growth in China will slow as a result of measures taken by the
government, economic activity in the long term will remain robust, and the
country’s appetite for energy will be huge. Emerging and developed countries
alike intend to expand rapidly to create jobs and maintain socioeconomic
stability, and energy needs are an important factor in that equation placing
immense upward pressure on global demand.
Conclusion: Slowing economic growth in key markets, partially caused by high oil prices and
interest rate increases to control inflation, will limit crude oil costs in the
coming year, but the long-term outlook is grim. The adverse impact of oil prices
on economic expansion in the short-term is undisputed, but the long-term trend
of oil prices has shifted from the low US$20s to low US$30s, not as a result of
short-term behavior but rather because of changing dynamics of supply and
demand. The much-talked about dearth of investment has a short- and maybe
medium-term impact on oil prices, but the pace of growth in demand is the
primary cause of the structural shift.
If the sheikhdoms fall and
are replaced by governments hostile to the Western world, lack of adequate
supply becomes a major concern in the long-term. New supplies are being
discovered in West Africa, Siberia, Central Asia, West Canada, and Venezuela,
but these additions to global capacity will not offset reductions in the Middle
East. Mega-mergers among the major energy companies will provide more capital
for additional exploration and development, but a decade is often required to go
from oil discovery to commercial production. It is certain that the pace of
increase in supply of oil will not match robust demand, especially if Muslim
countries limit shipments.
In the short term oil prices
will average about US$38.50 per bbl in 2004 (US$33.88 per bbl in the first half,
US$43.25 in the second half). If the invisible hand is allowed to operate
freely without interference from profiteering speculation and religious zealots,
the average in 2005 will be US$33.50/bbl. "In the long-run, we are all dead,"
said John Keynes. He was right, but if irrational oil speculation cannot be
prevented and religious fervor replaces the market place, the judgment day might
even come sooner.
DIRECTOR'S PERSPECTIVE Last Updated September 2004
|